This story has been corrected to accurately describe the impact of the Supreme Court’s 1964 decision, New York Times Co. v.

Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch call for overruling New York Times v. Sullivan in their dissent over the CNN-Dershowitz defamation decision.

In his dissent, Thomas argued that the 14th Amendment was a narrow correction for formerly enslaved Black Americans — not ...

Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch had a surprising take in his brief written dissent in the birthright citizenship case.

Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch believe the 1964 decision of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan should be ...

Barbara, on the meaning of birthright citizenship, “and in my judgment, the Court has made a serious mistake.” It’s a very ...

The Supreme Court revisiting the case, New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, would be "very significant," a legal expert told ...

The Supreme Court's 5-4 ruling upholds birthright citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment, with Roberts and Barrett ...

Three Supreme Court justices have issued judicial opinions that interpret the Fourteenth Amendment in a manner diverging from its established application, which guarantees citizenship to 'all persons ...

The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to take up a challenge to a land swap enabling mining at a sacred Indigenous site, garnering pushback from conservative Justices Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas.